Monday, July 10, 2006

Monitor Panorama

I have been looking around for about the past twelve months for a good solution to mounting my lcd's. Sure, the default lcd stand might be fine if you only have one, but what if you have three? Not only is it nice to have them neatly aligned, but positioned at a good head height. Some stands that lcd's come with are ok and adjustable, but generally the stand is the cheapest aspect of the monitor. Often not offering to much in the way of configuration. The design behind my Samsung's is good for transporting, as the stand folds up nice and flat. But they aren't as high as what I would like. Furthermore, positioning three of these adjustable stands to align the panels together is very difficult. The commercial monitor racks and stands I had looked at were generally priced between $400-$500 upwards.
Note: Dual monitor mounts are much cheaper.
It's when you step up to tri and quad setups
that it quickly becomes expensive.
As I am always building and upgrading other aspects of my pc's, I would prefer to not dump such a large amount of money into monitor stands. Like most tech junkies, I would rather spend that money on improving performance! Thus, for twelve months I had to make do (with it bugging me all the while longer). After finally succumbing to the realisation that I was still not ready to part with this sort of money for a commercial rack/wall mountable solution. I approached my father! After discussing some ideas two options quickly became apparent that would affect the overal stand design, mobility and alignment. A single stand solution would allow all three panels to be aligned together in a nice rigid structure. Probably allowing for a slightly better lineup then that of singular stands. Mobility however would be poor, as you could not easily move one monitor. Single stands would make moving out a monitor or two much easier, possibly comprimising on how well aligned they could be (as separate entities). Having decided that mobility was slightly more important to me, we decided an individual approach would be better. With some careful measuring and alignment, good results would still be achieved. DIY material costs? About $20 for the timber and screws. Dad's labor? priceless! The question then arises 'can you ever have too much screen real-estate?' No. More the better. Verdict Mobility - 5/5 Can easily detach the panels from the stands and the stands can easily be moved around individualy. Or if needed, removed altogether. Alignment 4/5 It's not perfect, but it's not bad either. In fact, with a bit of patience you can get them pretty well lined up. Cost 5/5 ~$500 - $20 = $480 saving. Panorama Utility So what can you do with your own little panorma setup?
  • Watch a widescreen movie across two panels whilst playing a game on the 3rd.
  • Instant Messaging (IM), downloads and web browsing on one screen, a game on another screen, tv episode on the other.
  • Documents, pdf's and other reading material on one screen. Code development on another screen and runtime/form development on the other.
  • One panel switched to a server pc (or another pc) with two monitors on the primary pc. A program called Synergy helps with this.
I have and do all of the above :) A tri setup is three times as good! A special thanks to my Dad for saving me a hole in my wallet and producing some nifty stands. Now they just need a coat of paint.

2 Comments:

Anonymous pimaster said...

Yeah, nice.
I take it they are all 19" @ 1280x1024.

It looks like the keyboard is a little close to the monitor. Have you got it at a confortable distance (or was it moved for the shot?)

What do you use to play a dvd across two panels!?!? Doesn't the break inbetween them destroy some of the movie?

Coding was the reason I went wide screen. The IDE is providing more and more useful information in the side panels that I love to leave open. Also, better description packages pushes the the width of these panels out.

7/11/2006 11:29:00 AM  
Blogger Joshua Hayes said...

Yes, the keyboard was pushed forward to clean up the desk a little :p

Actually they are 17". When I was looking around for lcd's a bit over a year ago I was not happy with the trend towards lcd's with speakers on, big fat trims etc. The slimline/bezzel were no where near as popular as what they are now. I suspect partly due to the increase in widescreen panels.

The other thing is, both 17" and 19" use the same 1280x1024 resolution. Personally, i've never liked the 19". You are not getting a better quality picture with any more pixels. In fact less if it has the same number of pixels but a bigger display. Fine for movies, but things look bigger and chunkier in games. IMO, not as nice :p

The bezzel on those Samsungs is exceptionally small, when sitting back on my bed watching a full widescreen movie across two, I don't even see the small bezzel in the middle. Overall you are looking at a much larger picture with very little black space above and below. But up close, obviously the gap in the middle would be more noticable.

At the end of the year I plan on adding a 23" or 24" :)

Oh, and the program that supports wall displays (you just configure where and how many displays you ahve)....VLC

7/11/2006 04:27:00 PM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home